This course is designed to
increase the student’s awareness of the framework and rationale for
collaboration and problem solving, the facilitating factors involved, and
strategies for implementation. The main emphasis of Consultation and
Collaborative Problem Solving is collaborative consultation as a process enabling people with diverse expertise to work
together generating solutions for educating all students with the purpose of
both preventing and alleviating the learning and adjustment difficulties of
individual or groups. Attention will be given to school aged students with
special needs and their placement in the regular school environment. This
course will provide an opportunity to develop skills essential to the
consulting process and collaboration between students, families and
professionals and will address academic, career and personal/social success for
all students.
·
Describe
and apply the principal theoretical models of consultation and problem solving
including mental health, behavioral, organizational, and instructional.
(CACREP M.6., C.1.)
·
Identify
the key stages and phases of the consultation and problem solving process.
(CACREP M.4.)
·
Develop
skills in the use of communication and interpersonal skills to facilitate the
consultative/problem solving process including building effective teams to
promote effective academic, career and social/personal development for students.
(CACREP M.3, C.2.)
·
Explain
knowledge of personal and environmental factors that influence the process and
outcome of consultation for typical and diverse populations. (CACREP A.3, B.2.,
F.3.)
·
Develop
skills and of strategies for evaluating the process and outcome of
consultation. (CACREP C.4.)
·
Select
strategies to promote and develop issues for effective teamwork relevant to
consultation and problem solving with parents, teachers, and the community as a
whole. (CACREP M.2.)
·
Explore
and describe legal and ethical responsibilities related to the consultation
process and working with a pluralistic population of students, families, school
personnel and the community as a whole. (CACREP A.2., B.1., E.1., E.2., F.4.)
·
Select
and evaluate important topics related to consultation and problem solving
research.(CACREP I.1., I.3.I.5., J.1.,J.2., M.3.,M.8.)
·
Explain
various theories of family, cultural, socio-economic, political, and community
influences; and the effects of stress/crisis on families (CACREP A.7., C.6.,
M.9., N.2.)
·
Create
plans for parent participation recognizing those parent attitudes influence
children’s dispositions to learn.( M.7.,N.1.)
·
Develop
a list of community resources/services to use and support students’ and their
families, teachers and other educational personnel. (CACREP N.5., M.7.)
·
Identify
and apply appropriate interventions such as peer programming, effective
referral procedures and curriculum / educational design to assist students,
families and educational personnel. (CACREP M.8.,N.5.,
N.2.)
This course will be
offered over a 15-week period and is a 45 hour 3 credit graduate course.
Students may use either a Macintosh computer or a PC with Windows 2000 or higher. Students should possess basic word processing skills and have Internet access as well as an active email account. Students also are expected to have a basic knowledge of how to use a Web browser, such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, etc.
This course will develop an increased awareness of the framework and rationale for collaboration and problem solving, the facilitating factors involved, and strategies for implementation of appropriate programs with school-age population, families, teachers and the community as a whole. Students will be involved in a variety of tasks for completion of course requirements: readings, reports on readings, exams, journal and reflection entries, projects related to real world learning environments, and development of instructional counseling strategies for specific content areas. Participants model appropriate assessment concepts to educational scenarios in each module.
Required Texts:
Interactions: Collaboration Skills for School
Professional (2007) 5th
ed. by Marilyn Friend and Lynne Cook
Home-School Relations: Working Successfully
with Parents and Families 3rd
ed. (2008), by Glenn Olsen and Mary Lou Fuller.
Online readings and Web site reviews, including
journal articles and best practices from the body of educational research, will
be assigned during the course to enhance learning. These readings will be
presented as annotated Web sites within the course content.
Student Performance
Requirements:
Students will complete assigned readings, written assignments, applications/practice/direct observations in the educational setting and forum postings (as required) in each module. Students will complete tests and special projects as listed in the module content.
|
100-93 |
A |
|
92-85 |
B |
|
84-77 |
C |
|
76-69 |
D |
|
69-0 |
F |
Student Academic Integrity
Students guarantee
that all academic class work is original. Any academic dishonesty or plagiarism
(to take ideas, writings, etc. from another and offer them as one's own), is a
violation of student academic behavior standards as outlined in the Teacher
Education University catalog and is subject to academic disciplinary action.
Online Resources
Judith
Sedgeman's The Three Principles at www.hsc.wvu.edu/sbi
Partnerships, Family, and
Narrative
Northwest Regional Laboratory School-Family-Community Partnership Team: www.nwrel.org/partnerships
or www.nwrel.org/partnerships/links/index.html
Harvard Family Research
Project and the Family Involvement Network of Educators: www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/fine.html
Narrative Space webpage at: elegantwebdesign.net/narrative/index.html
Nonviolent communication
resources for parents: www.cnvc.org/parents.htm
Resilience
The National Resilience Resource Center: www.cce.umn.edu/nrrc
Project Resilience: www.projectresilience.com
Search Institute: www.searchinstitute.org
Tucson Resiliency Initiative: www.tucsonresiliency.org
Safety The early warning
timely response – A guide to safe schools is found at: www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/gtss.html
Community-The Public
Conversations Project: www.publicconversations.org/pcp/resources/resources.asp
Education Reform and
Assessment: The Education Trust: www.edtrust.org
Oregon Department of
Education CIM and CAM: www.ode.state.or.us/cimcam
Center for Education Policy
Research: Understanding University Success: www.s4s.org
Other References:
Adelman, H. S. &
Taylor, L. (2003). On
sustainability of project innovations as systemic change.,
1-25. Journal of Educational and Psychological
Consultation 14.
Adelman H. , & Taylor, L. (2000).
Shaping the future of mental health in schools. Psychology in the Schools, 37(1),
49-60.
Alberto,
P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2006).< Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). Columbus, OH:
Merrill.
AmericanSchool Counselor Association. (2003). The ASCA national model: A
framework for school counseling programs. Alexandria, VA:
Author.
Braaten, B & Quinn, C.
(2000). Successful
inclusion of students with emotional and behavioraldisorders:
The Bryn Mawr Elementary School Program. Preventing School Failure, 45, 15-18.
Burns, M. K. (2004). Using curriculum-based
assessment in consultation: a review of three levels of research, , 63-78. Journal of Educational and
Psychological Consultation 15.
Craig, S., Hull, K., Haggart, A. G., & Perez-Selles,
M. P. (2000). Promoting cultural competencethrough
teacher assistance teams. Teaching Exceptional
Children, 32, (3) 6-13.
Cullinan, D. (2007). Students with emotional
and behavioral disorders: An introduction for teachers and other helping
professionals (2nd. ed.).
Columbus:
Pearson, Merril/Prentice Hall.
Curtis,
M., & Stollar, S. (1996). Applying principles and practices of organizational change to
school reform. School
Psychology Review, 25(4), 409-417.
Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simson, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & VanVoorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
French, N. K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 41-53.
Friend, M. & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals(Fourth edition). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Ingraham, C. L. (2000).Consultation through a multicultural
lens: Multicultural and cross-cultural
consultation in schools. School
Psychology Review, 29(3), 320-343.
Kauffman, J. M., Mostert, M. P., Trent, S. C., & Hallahan,
D. P. (2006). Managing
classroom behavior: A reflective case-based approach (4rd ed.). Boston:
Allyn & Bacon.
Kerr, M. M., & Nelson, C. M. (2006).
Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Knoster, T. P., & McCurdy, B.
(2002). Best practices
in functional behavioral assessment for designing individualized student
programs. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school
psychology IV. Bethesda, MD: National Association of Schoo lPsychologists.
Pryzwansky, W. B., Brown, D.,
Schulte, A. C. (2005).
Psychological consultation and collaboration: Introduction to theory and practice.
Needham, MA>:
Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
.Riggs, C. G., & Mueller, P. H. (2001). Employment and
utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. Journal of
Special Education, 35, 53-62.
Rosenfield, S. & Gravois, T. A.
. NY: The Guilford
Press.
Schwarz, P. & Bettenhausen,
D. L. (2000). You can
teach an old dog new tricks. In R. A. Villa& J. S.
Thousand (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education (pp.
469-483). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Sheridan, S., Kratochwill, T. R., & Bergan,
J. R. (1996).Conjoint Behavioral Consultation: A Procedural Manual. NY:Plenum Press.
Sladeczek, I.,
Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Robertson-Mjaanes, S. (2001). Application of goal
attainment scaling to a conjoint behavioral consultation case. Journal
of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 45-58.
Steege, Brown-Chidsey, & Mace (2002) Best
practices in evaluating interventions. In A Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best
practices in school psychology IV. (pp.517-534). Bethesda, MD>:National Association of School
Psychologists.

Teacher Education University is accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC). The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency and is a recognized member of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.