Course Description
This course is designed to provide the knowledge and skills required to understand, interpret, generate and evaluate research relevant to various areas of school counseling. The student will become familiar with basic and applied research, program evaluation and associated measurement and evaluation skills that are crucial for all counseling professionals. The student is provided opportunities to acquire greater awareness, familiarity and knowledge of the most basic elementary concepts, principles, and techniques of educational research. Both the traditional content and electronic resources of educational research are emphasized. The student will identify, delineate, operationalize, and write a research proposal for a topic pertaining to contemporary education. In this course the student will study of the nature and complexities of the educational research processes including the identification and completion of an approved educational research project as a course requirement. The general principles of research will be presented in this course with the student examining areas such as statistics, research design, and development of research and demonstration proposals.
This course will be offered over a 15-week period and is a 45 hour 3 credit graduate course. Modules will be completed one per week.
Students may use either a Macintosh computer or a PC with Windows 2000 or higher. Students should possess basic word processing skills and have Internet access as well as an active email account. Students also are expected to have a basic knowledge of how to use a Web browser, such as Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, etc.
Curriculum Design
Research Methods for School Counselors is a forty-five hour, 3 credit graduate course covered over a fifteen-week period. This course is a supervised fieldwork experience in which the University and on-site administrator guides, instructs and supervises the student’s introduction to a particular functional project. This course offers an opportunity to gain additional insight into a specific issue, problem, or concern in your specific area of school counseling. The end product of your functional project is a tangible outcome of the learning experience and needs to be jointly determined by your on-site administrator, course professor and you based on the information gained in this course. It is very important that you find out what if any restrictions there may be on completing specific research at the site of your practicum experience and get clearance from your on-site administrator. The extent of involvement of the student’s on-site administrator is through phone conferences and e-mails with the course professor and student where applicable. Documentation of student contact with the administrator will be through notarized papers from the administrator and the student.
Required Course Texts:
Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen,
N.E.( 2006) How to Design and Evaluate Research in
Education 6th ed..McGraw-Hill:
Online readings and Web site reviews (including journal articles and best practices from the body of educational research) will be assigned during the course to enhance learning. These readings will be presented as annotated Web sites within the course content.
Student Performance Requirements:
Students will complete assigned readings, written assignments, applications/practice/direct observations in the educational setting and forum postings (as required) in each module. Students will complete tests, special projects and research proposal as listed in the module content.
Module 1: Introduction to Research
Objectives:
Module 2: The Basics of Educational Research: Developing the Research Problem
Objectives:
Module 3: The Basics of Educational Research: Principles of Ethical Research
Objectives:
Module 4: The Basics of Educational Research: Review of Literature, Sampling, Instrumentation, Validity and Reliability
Objectives:
Module 5: The Basics of Educational Research: Instrumentation, Validity and Reliability
Objectives:
Objectives:
Module 7: Quantitative Research Methodologies
Objectives:
.Module 8: Qualitative Research
Objectives:
Module 9: Action Research
Objectives:
Module 10: Peer Review of Research Proposal
Objectives:
Module 11-Research Project Proposal
Objectives:
Student Requirements
Grading:
100-93 |
A |
92-85 |
B |
84-77 |
C |
76-69 |
|
69- |
Participants guarantee that all academic class work is original. Any academic dishonesty or plagiarism (to take ideas, writings, etc. from another and offer them as one's own), is a violation of student academic behavior standards as outlined in the Teacher Education University catalog and is subject to academic disciplinary action.
References
Online Resources
Writing Resources
http://www.uvm.edu/-ncrane/estyles
http://www.inkspot.com
http://www.bucknell.edu/-rbeard/diction.html
http://owl.english.purdue.edu
http://askjeevs.com
http://www.studyweb.com
http://www.beadsland.com/weapas/
www.apastyle.org.elecref.html
Research Topic (preliminary exploration)
http://www.cleaninghouse.net
http://www.irl.org/pubs/
http://www.nwrel.org/national/
http://ericae.net/search.htm
Review of the literature
http://www.aspensys.com/eric/
http://nces.ed.gov
http://www.alexa.com
http://info.lib.uh.edu.wj/webjour.htm
http://gort.ucsd.edu:80/newjour/
http://edrs.com
http://www.lib.umi.com/dissertations
http://uncweb.carl.org/
Methodology
http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/quad.htm
http://www.yforum.com/
http://www.stat.scarolina.edu/rsrch/gasp/
http://www.demographics.com
http://trochim.human.cornell.edu/kb/kbhome.htm
http://www.irn.pdx.edu/kerlinb/researchware.htm
http://www.nsrs.com
Assessment and Evaluation
http://ericae.net
http://www.fairtest.org
Proposal Development
http://www.fastlane.nsf.gov
http://www.biostat.wisc.edu/grantworks/
Human Subjects Review
http://www.psych.bangar.ac.uk/deptpsych/ethics/humanresearch.html
Reference:
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American
Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: .
Brown, K. J. (2002, January). 'One bite at a time': Intervention practices in Utah districts strengthen reading teachers and improve student literacy. School Administrator, 59, 24+.
Burnaford, G. Fischer, J. & Hobson, D. (1996). Teachers doing research: Practical possibilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burant, T. J. (1999). Finding, using, and losing voice: A preservice teacher's experiences in an urban educative practicum. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(3), 209.
Chapman, B. S. (1999). Praxis: An adult education practicum. Adult Learning, 11(1), 14.
Fitch,
T. J.
Fitch, T. J. & Marshall, J. L. (2002). Using cognitive interventions with counseling practicum students during group supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41(4), 335+.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N.E. (2001). Education research: A guide to the process. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fraenkel, J. & Wallen, N. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.
Gay, L.R. Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (8th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Glanz, Jeffery. (2003). Action research: an educational leader’s guide to school improvement (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
Glenwick, D. S. & Busch-Rossnagel, N. A. (1993). Co-Teaching a joint graduate practicum in community and applied developmental psychology. Teaching of Psychology , 20(3), 141-143.
Graf, N. M. & Stebnicki, M. A. (2002). Using e-mail for clinical supervision in practicum: A qualitative analysis. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 68(3), 41+.
Grossman, B. (2005). Maria Berg-Weger and Julie Birkenmeyer, the practicum companion for social work: Integrating class and field work. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 32(1), 162+.
Haigh, M. & Ward, G. (2004). Problematising practicum relationships: Questioning the 'Taken for Granted'. Australian Journal of Education, 48(2), 134+.
Huinker, D. & Freckmann, J. L. (2004, March). Focusing conversations to promote teacher thinking. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10, 352+.
James, L. E. & Watson, S. B. (2001). The effects of participating in an elementary science practicum on classroom practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 13(1), 43+.
Lowery, Lawrence (2001). The biological basis for thinking and learning. Berkeley: University of California.
Ortlipp, M. (2003). Assessment of the early childhood practicum: What can we learn from tertiary supervisors' silences?. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 28(4), 29+.
Panos, P. T. Panos, A. Cox, S. E. Roby, J. L. & Matheson, K. W. (2002). Ethical issues concerning the use of videoconferencing to supervise international social work field practicum students. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(3), 421+.
Ralph, E. G. (1999). Oral-questioning skills of novice teachers: . Any questions. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26(4), 286.
Regehr, C. Regehr, G. Leeson, J. & Fusco, L. (2002). Setting priorities for learning in the field practicum: A comparative study of students and field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 38(1), 55+.
Stier, K. W. (2001). Updating course content and instruction through a practicum experience. The Technology Teacher, 61(1), 27.
Szuchman, L.T. (2002). Writing with style: APA style for counseling. Pacific Grove, CA:

Teacher Education University is accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC). The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency and is a recognized member of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.